Aikido

Top DevSecOps Tools to Replace GitLab Ultimate’s Security Features

Ruben CamerlynckRuben Camerlynck
|
#
#

Introduction

GitLab Ultimate is a popular all-in-one platform for DevOps that also includes integrated application security (AppSec). It offers source control, CI/CD, and built-in security tools (like SAST and DAST) under one roof. This end-to-end approach is powerful, but many teams are now looking for alternatives due to usability issues, cost, false positives, and a poor developer experience.

Users have reported that “for beginners its UI feels complex and cluttered... and its premium features are costly”. Others complain about noisy scan results — one developer on Reddit noted “egregious false positives” (even “a few brackets being counted as a secret” by the scanner). Another user said “basic security features are put behind an unreasonable paywall”, reflecting frustration with GitLab’s pricing and packaging.

If you’re short on time, feel free to skip to the Top Alternatives to GitLab Ultimate for a quick overview of the tools. Below is a preview of the five alternatives we’ll cover:

  • Aikido Security – Developer-first, all-in-one AppSec platform (code to cloud)g
  • ArmorCode – Application Security Posture Management for tool aggregation and governance
  • Snyk – Developer-centric SCA and container security tool
  • SpectralOps – Lightweight code scanner (secrets and misconfigurations)
  • Veracode – Enterprise-friendly AppSec suite for SAST/DAST and more

If you’re rethinking GitLab’s built-in security, check out our Top AppSec Tools in 2025 — a curated list of platforms built to secure your SDLC.

What Is GitLab Ultimate?

  • Top-tier DevSecOps platform: GitLab Ultimate is the highest paid tier of GitLab, combining source code management, CI/CD, and security capabilities in one platform.
  • Built-in security scanners: Ultimate includes integrated scanners for Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST), dependency scanning (SCA), container image scanning, secret detection, and more.
  • Security dashboards and management: It provides vulnerability reports and dashboards where security teams can review findings and enforce policies.
  • Who it’s for: Enterprises and regulated teams that need to embed security checks into CI/CD pipelines and want out-of-the-box compliance.

Why Look for Alternatives?

Teams consider GitLab Ultimate alternatives when they encounter these pain points with its security features:

  • Bloated interface & slow scans
  • False positives in scans
  • Limited runtime visibility – GitLab lacks integrated cloud security posture management or runtime observability.
  • Confusing, opaque pricing
  • Not developer-first – lacks real developer workflow integration or inline remediation.

Key Criteria for Choosing an Alternative

When evaluating GitLab Ultimate alternatives focused on AppSec, prioritize the following:

  • Developer experience – IDE plugins, clear issue remediation, friendly UX
  • Fast & accurate results – Avoid alert fatigue from noisy scanners
  • Breadth of coverage – Support for SAST, DAST, IaC, SCA, secrets, and container security
  • CI/CD integration – Works with your pipeline, not against it
  • Transparent pricing – Predictable plans, no sales maze

Comparison Table

Tool SAST DAST SCA Secrets Detection Best For
GitLab Ultimate Static code scans built-in Basic DAST available SCA for open source Detects hardcoded secrets All-in-one GitLab stack
Aikido Security Fast SAST with low false positives Modern DAST included Accurate open source insights Secrets detection built-in Dev-first, code-to-cloud security
ArmorCode No native SAST engine Requires integration Relies on 3rd-party tools Not focused on secrets Security aggregation & governance
Snyk Good SAST for JS & JVM DAST not included Strong open source SCA Secrets not a core focus Open source & container scanning
SpectralOps No static code analysis No DAST capabilities Limited to config/code hygiene Excellent for secrets hygiene Secrets & config hygiene
Veracode Enterprise SAST solution Mature DAST support Comprehensive SCA suite Secrets not core functionality Enterprise-scale AppSec

Top Alternatives to GitLab Ultimate

Based on the above needs, here are five of the best GitLab Ultimate alternatives for application security:

  • Aikido Security – Developer-first, all-in-one AppSec platform
  • ArmorCode – Unified AppSec orchestration (aggregation & governance)
  • Snyk – Developer-centric SCA and container security
  • SpectralOps – Lightweight code scanner for secrets & misconfigs
  • Veracode – Enterprise-grade AppSec suite (SAST, DAST, etc.)

Aikido Security

Overview: Aikido Security is a developer-first platform that provides an all-in-one solution for application security, covering everything from code to cloud. It combines multiple scanners and tools under a single dashboard – including static code analysis, open-source dependency scanning, container and Infrastructure as Code (IaC) checks, API testing, cloud configuration scanning, and more. Aikido’s standout capability is its emphasis on accuracy and automation: it uses AI to reduce false positives and even offers one-click fixes for certain issues via its AI AutoFix feature.

Key Features:

  • Unified scanning – One platform for SAST, DAST, SCA, secrets detection, container and cloud scanning, etc.
  • AI-assisted fixes – Automated remediation via AI-powered suggestions, including merge requests.
  • Developer-friendly integrations – Deep hooks into CI/CD pipelines, IDEs, Slack, and Git platforms.

Why Choose It: If your team is frustrated with GitLab Ultimate’s noise or complexity, Aikido is a strong choice. It’s ideal for teams that want comprehensive AppSec coverage but with a simpler, developer-first experience. You’ll benefit from far fewer false positives, faster triage, and more automation from code to cloud. It also offers a transparent pricing model and a free tier, making it easier to try without commitment.

ArmorCode

Overview: ArmorCode is an Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) platform focused on aggregating and orchestrating your security tools. It connects to your scanners (SAST, DAST, cloud, etc.) and centralizes all findings into one system for prioritization and governance. Unlike point scanners, it doesn’t scan code directly — it helps teams manage AppSec at scale.

Key Features:

  • Unified AppSec dashboard – Aggregates SAST, DAST, cloud, and IaC scanner results across projects.
  • Risk-based triage – Prioritizes alerts using business context and risk scoring.
  • Automation & compliance – Streamlines workflows for policy enforcement and compliance tracking.

Why Choose It: ArmorCode is great for companies that already use multiple security tools and need a “single pane of glass” to manage them. It’s not a scanner — it’s an orchestrator. Choose it if you want better governance, visibility, and process automation on top of your existing AppSec stack, especially at enterprise scale.

Snyk

Overview: Snyk is a developer-centric security tool focused on finding vulnerabilities in open-source dependencies, container images, and IaC configs. Originally built for SCA, it has since expanded into container and IaC security, and offers SAST capabilities via Snyk Code. Its core strength lies in seamless dev workflow integrations and a huge open-source vulnerability database.

Key Features:

  • Open source dependency scanning – Monitors for vulnerable packages and license issues across multiple ecosystems.
  • Container and IaC scanning – Flags insecure Docker images and misconfigured Terraform, Kubernetes, and CloudFormation.
  • Developer-first UX – GitHub/GitLab integration, CLI tools, and automated fix PRs for fast remediation.

Why Choose It: Snyk shines if your top concern is supply chain risk. Its dev-friendly design, CI/CD integration, and automated patch suggestions make it ideal for teams securing open-source dependencies and containers. Just note it’s more focused than a full-stack platform like Aikido.

SpectralOps

Overview: SpectralOps is a fast, lightweight scanner built to catch sensitive data and misconfigurations before they hit production. Its key strength lies in secret detection and scanning infrastructure files for insecure defaults. It’s popular with DevOps and security engineers who want speed and simplicity without sacrificing coverage on high-risk issues.

Key Features:

  • Secret scanning – Finds hardcoded API keys, credentials, tokens, and certs in code, configs, and commit history.
  • IaC misconfig detection – Flags risky settings in Terraform and Kubernetes files.
  • Ultra-fast CI integration – Drop-in CLI scanner that runs in seconds with minimal config.

Why Choose It: Spectral is best for teams who want focused protection against the most damaging mistakes (like key leaks) and don’t need a full-blown AppSec platform. It complements GitLab or other scanners well, and works especially well in fast-moving DevOps pipelines.

Veracode

Overview: Veracode is an enterprise-grade Application Security Testing (AST) suite known for its depth and compliance readiness. It offers SAST, DAST, and SCA, delivered mostly as a cloud service. It’s widely used by large organizations with complex security and governance needs.

Key Features:

  • Static and dynamic analysis – Deep scans across codebases and live apps, mapped to CWE/OWASP standards.
  • Policy and compliance management – Tools to enforce org-wide security policies and track remediation SLAs.
  • Reporting and training – Dashboards, analytics, and developer training to support secure SDLC adoption.

Why Choose It: Veracode is ideal if you need auditability, compliance, and scale across a large engineering org. It’s less flexible for individual developers than tools like Aikido, but excels when paired with a security team managing a centralized program.

Conclusion

GitLab Ultimate offers a lot—but it’s not always what fast-moving dev teams need. Whether it’s the noise, the cost, or the clunky experience, more teams are moving to alternatives that are faster, leaner, and more developer-first.

If you want a simpler, more accurate way to secure your code, cloud, and CI/CD without the bloat, try Aikido Security — or book a demo to see it in action.

FAQ

What is the best free alternative to GitLab Ultimate?

If you’re looking for a free option, Snyk is often cited as a top choice. Snyk offers a generous free tier for open source projects and small teams, allowing you to scan your code dependencies and containers at no cost (with certain usage limits). It’s very developer-friendly and easy to integrate.

Another option is Aikido Security’s free plan, which provides an all-in-one security platform with limited usage for free – this is great if you want broad coverage (SAST, SCA, etc.) without budget.

For purely open-source solutions, you could also assemble your own toolchain (for example, OWASP Zap for DAST, open-source SAST tools, etc.), but that requires more effort. Snyk (for dependency scanning) combined with GitLab’s built-in free scanners could cover a lot of ground for zero cost, with Snyk being the more polished tool for developers.

Why switch from GitLab Ultimate to Aikido Security?

Switching to Aikido Security can significantly improve the developer experience and reduce noise. GitLab Ultimate’s security suite is powerful but often overwhelming – in contrast, Aikido takes a developer-first approach with a cleaner UI and far fewer false positives (thanks to its AI engine).

Teams report that Aikido’s results are more relevant, and its real-time feedback (in IDEs and merge requests) helps developers fix issues faster. Additionally, Aikido covers everything Ultimate does (code, open-source, containers, IaC, etc.) in one platform, but with more automation (like one-click fixes) and simpler, transparent pricing.

If you’re paying a lot for Ultimate and not loving the UX or the signal-to-noise ratio, Aikido can be a refreshing change that boosts productivity and security outcomes at the same time.

Can I use multiple security tools together?

Absolutely. In practice many organizations use a combination of AppSec tools to cover different needs. For example, you might use Snyk for dependency scanning and container security, plus a SAST tool like Veracode or Aikido for code analysis.

You can also run GitLab’s own scanners in tandem with external tools – they won’t usually conflict (apart from consuming more CI minutes). Using multiple tools can improve coverage, but be mindful that it also adds overhead: you’ll need to manage various integrations and deal with possibly overlapping findings.

This is where an aggregation platform like ArmorCode can help, by pulling all findings into one view. The key is to clearly define which tool is responsible for which type of testing to avoid confusion. Many teams, for instance, use one tool for SAST and a different one for DAST, since no single solution is best-in-class at everything. As long as you integrate their outputs into your workflow (for example, all creating tickets in the same Jira), using multiple tools can provide a layered defense.

Is GitLab Ultimate good for application security?

GitLab Ultimate is a solid offering for AppSec in the sense that it provides a lot of security functionality out-of-the-box. It’s especially convenient if you’re already using GitLab for CI/CD – the scanners can run automatically on your pipelines, giving you a baseline of SAST, DAST, dependency scanning, and more without purchasing separate products.

For basic application security needs and compliance checkboxes, Ultimate does the job. However, “good” is relative to your experience using it. Many teams find that while the features are there, the developer experience is not ideal (lots of false positives, clunky interface, difficulty customizing scans).

So GitLab Ultimate covers the bases of AppSec, but it might not be the most efficient or developer-friendly way to do it. If you have a dedicated security team to manage it and tune it, Ultimate can yield good results. If not, you might get better value from a specialized tool that the developers find easier to work with.

Which GitLab Ultimate alternative is best for developers?

For a developer-centric experience, Aikido Security and Snyk are top contenders. Aikido Security is built to be dev-first: it integrates into coding workflows, provides very actionable results with minimal noise, and even fixes issues automatically – all of which developers appreciate because it saves time.

Snyk is also highly developer-friendly, focused on the areas (like open-source libs and containers) that developers deal with, with a slick UI and helpful guided fixes.

If your team values a clean UX and integration with tools like VS Code, Slack, and GitHub/GitLab, these two are excellent choices. SpectralOps is another developer-friendly tool, albeit more specialized (great for devs to catch secrets and config issues early).

On the other hand, an enterprise tool like Veracode, while very powerful, can feel less approachable for individual developers (it’s often managed more by the security team). So, if we’re talking “which is best for developers to engage with directly,” Aikido and Snyk would be at the top of the list.

You Might Also Like:

{

 "@context": "https://schema.org",

 "@graph": [

   {

     "@type": "FAQPage",

     "mainEntity": [

       {

         "@type": "Question",

         "name": "What is the best free alternative to GitLab Ultimate?",

         "acceptedAnswer": {

           "@type": "Answer",

           "text": "If you’re looking for a free option, Snyk is often cited as a top choice. Snyk offers a generous free tier for open source projects and small teams, allowing you to scan your code dependencies and containers at no cost (with certain usage limits). It’s very developer-friendly and easy to integrate.\n\nAnother option is Aikido Security’s free plan, which provides an all-in-one security platform with limited usage for free – this is great if you want broad coverage (SAST, SCA, etc.) without budget.\n\nFor purely open-source solutions, you could also assemble your own toolchain (for example, OWASP ZAP for DAST, open-source SAST tools, etc.), but that requires more effort. Snyk (for dependency scanning) combined with GitLab’s built-in free scanners could cover a lot of ground for zero cost, with Snyk being the more polished tool for developers."

         }

       },

       {

         "@type": "Question",

         "name": "Why switch from GitLab Ultimate to Aikido Security?",

         "acceptedAnswer": {

           "@type": "Answer",

           "text": "Switching to Aikido Security can significantly improve the developer experience and reduce noise. GitLab Ultimate’s security suite is powerful but often overwhelming – in contrast, Aikido takes a developer-first approach with a cleaner UI and far fewer false positives (thanks to its AI engine).\n\nTeams report that Aikido’s results are more relevant, and its real-time feedback (in IDEs and merge requests) helps developers fix issues faster. Additionally, Aikido covers everything Ultimate does (code, open-source, containers, IaC, etc.) in one platform, but with more automation (like one-click fixes) and simpler, transparent pricing.\n\nIf you’re paying a lot for Ultimate and not loving the UX or the signal-to-noise ratio, Aikido can be a refreshing change that boosts productivity and security outcomes at the same time."

         }

       },

       {

         "@type": "Question",

         "name": "Can I use multiple security tools together?",

         "acceptedAnswer": {

           "@type": "Answer",

           "text": "Absolutely. In practice many organizations use a combination of AppSec tools to cover different needs. For example, you might use Snyk for dependency scanning and container security, plus a SAST tool like Veracode or Aikido for code analysis.\n\nYou can also run GitLab’s own scanners in tandem with external tools – they won’t usually conflict (apart from consuming more CI minutes). Using multiple tools can improve coverage, but be mindful that it also adds overhead: you’ll need to manage various integrations and deal with possibly overlapping findings.\n\nThis is where an aggregation platform like ArmorCode can help, by pulling all findings into one view. The key is to clearly define which tool is responsible for which type of testing to avoid confusion. Many teams, for instance, use one tool for SAST and a different one for DAST, since no single solution is best at everything. As long as you integrate their outputs into your workflow (for example, all creating tickets in the same Jira), using multiple tools can provide a layered defense."

         }

       },

       {

         "@type": "Question",

         "name": "Is GitLab Ultimate good for application security?",

         "acceptedAnswer": {

           "@type": "Answer",

           "text": "GitLab Ultimate is a solid offering for AppSec in that it provides a lot of security functionality out-of-the-box. It’s especially convenient if you’re already using GitLab for CI/CD – the scanners can run automatically in your pipelines, giving you a baseline of SAST, DAST, dependency scanning, and more without purchasing separate products.\n\nFor basic application security needs and compliance checkboxes, Ultimate does the job. However, “good” is relative to your experience using it. Many teams find that while the features are there, the developer experience is not ideal (lots of false positives, clunky interface, difficulty customizing scans).\n\nSo GitLab Ultimate covers the bases of AppSec, but it might not be the most efficient or developer-friendly way to do it. If you have a dedicated security team to manage and tune it, Ultimate can yield good results. If not, you might get better value from a specialized tool that developers find easier to work with."

         }

       },

       {

         "@type": "Question",

         "name": "Which GitLab Ultimate alternative is best for developers?",

         "acceptedAnswer": {

           "@type": "Answer",

           "text": "For a developer-centric experience, Aikido Security and Snyk are top contenders. Aikido Security is built to be dev-first: it integrates into coding workflows, provides very actionable results with minimal noise, and even fixes issues automatically – all of which developers appreciate because it saves time.\n\nSnyk is also highly developer-friendly, focused on the areas (like open-source libraries and containers) that developers deal with, with a slick UI and helpful guided fixes.\n\nIf your team values a clean UX and integration with tools like VS Code, Slack, and GitHub/GitLab, these two are excellent choices. SpectralOps is another developer-friendly tool, albeit more specialized (great for catching secrets and config issues early).\n\nOn the other hand, an enterprise tool like Veracode, while very powerful, can feel less approachable for individual developers (it’s often managed more by the security team). So if we’re talking about which is best for developers to engage with directly, Aikido and Snyk would be at the top of the list."

         }

       }

     ]

   },

   {

     "@type": "ItemList",

     "itemListElement": [

       {

         "@type": "ListItem",

         "position": 1,

         "name": "Aikido Security",

         "url": "#aikido-security"

       },

       {

         "@type": "ListItem",

         "position": 2,

         "name": "ArmorCode",

         "url": "#armorcode"

       },

       {

         "@type": "ListItem",

         "position": 3,

         "name": "Snyk",

         "url": "#snyk"

       },

       {

         "@type": "ListItem",

         "position": 4,

         "name": "SpectralOps",

         "url": "#spectralops"

       },

       {

         "@type": "ListItem",

         "position": 5,

         "name": "Veracode",

         "url": "#veracode"

       }

     ]

   }

 ]

}

Get secure for free

Secure your code, cloud, and runtime in one central system.
Find and fix vulnerabilities fast automatically.

No credit card required |Scan results in 32secs.